Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nelogica: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:00, 29 June 2022

Nelogica

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Brochure article. scope_creep^Talk 12:42, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Brazil. Shellwood (talk) 13:14, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I wrote the page. It seems to me that it meets the primary criteria in WP:NCORP: there is substantial coverage of the subject (whole articles about it, sources are cited in the page, e.g. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]) in multiple reliable sources completely independent of the subject and of each other, such as Zero Hora, Exame, O Globo and Endeavor_(non-profit) (see aforementioned links). The coverage spans at least 4 years (2019-2022). Seems enough? Saturnalia0 (talk) 17:50, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That coverage is completely routine and fails various parts of WP:NCORP. For example the first ref is an interviews, failing WP:SIRS and WP:ORGIND. The refs are woeful for this startup. It is not coverage, its routine press-release fodder. The rest are the same including the non-rs blog. scope_creep^Talk 20:00, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 17:53, 29 June 2022 edit Saturnalia0 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers 1,920 edits m typo ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:00, 29 June 2022 edit undo Scope creep (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers 141,079 edits comment/reply Next edit →
Line 9:		Line 9:

	{{Comment}} I wrote the page. It seems to me that it meets the primary criteria in [[WP:NCORP]]: there is substantial coverage of the subject (whole articles about it, sources are cited in the page, e.g. [https://endeavor.org.br/historia-de-empreendedores/um-exemplo-para-acreditar-por-que-a-nelogica-pode-se-tornar-uma-das-primeiras-fintechs-brasileiras-de-impacto-global/] [https://braziljournal.com/exclusivo-nelogica-avaliada-em-r-29-bilhoes-em-rodada-com-crescera-e-vulcan/] [https://gauchazh.clicrbs.com.br/colunistas/marta-sfredo/noticia/2019/06/comecaremos-operacao-nos-eua-e-talvez-na-europa-ainda-neste-ano-diz-ceo-da-nelogica-cjxdp23vz033s01o9cfq78pah.html] [https://gauchazh.clicrbs.com.br/colunistas/marta-sfredo/noticia/2020/05/em-plena-pandemia-empresa-gaucha-ganha-40-mais-clientes-e-precisa-preencher-150-vagas-para-ontem-ckah5a7p000jp015nak7k2amj.html] [https://exame.com/pme/com-aporte-de-r-550-milhoes-nelogica-e-avaliada-em-r-29-bilhoes/] [https://blogs.oglobo.globo.com/capital/post/aquisicao-na-tela-do-day-trader-nelogica-compra-comdinheiro-de-paschoarelli.html]) in multiple reliable sources completely independent of the subject and of each other, such as [[Zero Hora]], [[Exame]], [[O Globo]] and [[Endeavor_(non-profit)]] (see aforementioned links). The coverage spans at least 4 years (2019-2022). Seems enough? [[User:Saturnalia0\|Saturnalia0]] ([[User talk:Saturnalia0\|talk]]) 17:50, 29 June 2022 (UTC)		{{Comment}} I wrote the page. It seems to me that it meets the primary criteria in [[WP:NCORP]]: there is substantial coverage of the subject (whole articles about it, sources are cited in the page, e.g. [https://endeavor.org.br/historia-de-empreendedores/um-exemplo-para-acreditar-por-que-a-nelogica-pode-se-tornar-uma-das-primeiras-fintechs-brasileiras-de-impacto-global/] [https://braziljournal.com/exclusivo-nelogica-avaliada-em-r-29-bilhoes-em-rodada-com-crescera-e-vulcan/] [https://gauchazh.clicrbs.com.br/colunistas/marta-sfredo/noticia/2019/06/comecaremos-operacao-nos-eua-e-talvez-na-europa-ainda-neste-ano-diz-ceo-da-nelogica-cjxdp23vz033s01o9cfq78pah.html] [https://gauchazh.clicrbs.com.br/colunistas/marta-sfredo/noticia/2020/05/em-plena-pandemia-empresa-gaucha-ganha-40-mais-clientes-e-precisa-preencher-150-vagas-para-ontem-ckah5a7p000jp015nak7k2amj.html] [https://exame.com/pme/com-aporte-de-r-550-milhoes-nelogica-e-avaliada-em-r-29-bilhoes/] [https://blogs.oglobo.globo.com/capital/post/aquisicao-na-tela-do-day-trader-nelogica-compra-comdinheiro-de-paschoarelli.html]) in multiple reliable sources completely independent of the subject and of each other, such as [[Zero Hora]], [[Exame]], [[O Globo]] and [[Endeavor_(non-profit)]] (see aforementioned links). The coverage spans at least 4 years (2019-2022). Seems enough? [[User:Saturnalia0\|Saturnalia0]] ([[User talk:Saturnalia0\|talk]]) 17:50, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
			::That coverage is completely routine and fails various parts of [[WP:NCORP]]. For example the first ref is an interviews, failing [[WP:SIRS]] and [[WP:ORGIND]]. The refs are woeful for this startup. It is not coverage, its routine press-release fodder. The rest are the same including the non-rs blog. '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px black; font-family:Papyrus">[[User:scope_creep\|<span style="color:#3399ff">scope_creep</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:scope_creep#top\|Talk]]</sup></span>''' 20:00, 29 June 2022 (UTC)